Course Design

This guide to designing your course, regardless of teaching modality, is built on a framework known as “Backward Design." It explains the stages of Backward Design and provides suggestions for identifying learning objectives, planning a learning module, and, finally, designing your course syllabus.
?

Course Design resources

?

Backward Design


Most faculty have used a “forward thinking” approach to course design – first, identify or develop materials and activities for teaching, then design assessments to measure the teaching outcomes. Forward design is a chronological way to create course materials, presentations, assignments, and assessments. Many researchers have challenged this process by pointing out that the “forward” design's focus is on the teaching process and not the learning outcomes.

Backward Design model

In their book,?Understanding by Design, Wiggins?and?McTighe?(2005)?offer a different course design framework called?“Backward Design.”?Backward Design has three stages.??

  • Stage 1 focuses on?identifying?the learning outcomes?at the course level and the learning objectives for each module, unit, or topic.??
  • Stage 2?involves designing?and developing?assessments to measure?student performance with regard to?the learning objectives?from?Stage 1.??
  • Once the learning outcomes/objectives are clear?and assessments are confirmed, you will move to?Stage 3?with?a better idea about what type of instructional activities?best align with these outcomes/objectives and?will help students to be successful.?

Understanding by Design,?Grant Wiggins'?two-part video series


?

Syllabus Design


Your course syllabus communicates your course design and expectations to students.?

Consider adding the following resource information to your syllabus, as appropriate for your course:?UNH Syllabus Template.

Review the resources regarding AI policies on the Academic Affairs Office of the Provost site above (UNH Syllabus template).?

This is an additional Stanford University?resource with additional ideas on AI policies in your course.

In addition, here is a resource on AI detection Software Best Practices developed by Teaching and Learning Technologies.

Backward Design, Cell Biology course,
MSU Graduate School


To apply Backward Design planning in your course, use this?Backward Design Template (in the Downloads section, select Design tools and download the latest UbD Unit Template).

Backward Design Resources

?

Learning Objectives


Think about the kind of learning that your students should be able to demonstrate after completing a component of your course. Do you want them to explain a concept? Apply a theory? Evaluate a business plan? Solve a complex problem? ?

Bloom’s taxonomy (Bloom et al,. 1956) is one of the most widely used frameworks for categorizing learning outcomes. The original taxonomy included six levels of learning: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. In addition to the initial focus on the cognitive domain, taxonomies were later developed for the affective and psychomotor domains. The taxonomy for the cognitive domain was revised (Krathwohl, 2002) to use verbs, rather than nouns, to define the levels: Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, and Create. ?

Graphic of Bloom's Taxonomy

?

Once you identify the level of expertise, use ?appropriate verbs? corresponding to the levels of Bloom’s taxonomy?in the appropriate domain?to construct your learning objectives.?

Learning objectives should be student-centered; that is,?they should express what the?student?will be able to do after completing instructional activities.?Objectives?should be clear, concise, and?measurable. A measurable objective is described with observable action verbs.??

An objective, “Understand?the differences between x and y” is not sufficient in that there is no way for you, the instructor, to directly measure understanding.?You?can only observe actions that demonstrate understanding.
Instead, the objective might be rephrased: “List?the differences between x and y”. Or, for a higher level of learning, “Explain?the differences between x and y.”?

In the case above, “List” might be assessed through a simple multiple answer or short answer quiz question, whereas “Explain” would require an essay, mind map, or presentation. Think about how you will assess student learning and phrase the objective appropriately.?

Pay close attention to crafting good learning objectives when you outline your course. Doing so not only directs student efforts during the course, but also assists you in aligning your assessments while developing the instructional module.?Gronlund (1991) provides detailed guidance on writing learning objectives for?all domains (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor).???

Objectives Resources

?

Lesson/Module Planning


When?the learning outcomes?at the course level and learning objectives at the module level are identified?and?assessment methods?are?established, we?move to?the last?stage?of Backward?Design. In this?stage,?you develop?learning activities?and plans?to provide students with the resources and information necessary to achieve the?course outcomes and module objectives.?

How should you organize your course content?within a?module??What?kinds?of?teaching and learning?“events” will support student success??Gagne’s Nine Events of Instruction?and research on constructivist learning environments and content chunking all provide useful guidance.?

Lesson/Module Planning Resources

?

Nine Events of Instruction

Gagne proposed?nine?instructional “events” that elicit a series of internal mental processes?that support learning?(Gagne, Briggs, and Wager, 1992).

Instructional Event

Internal Mental Process

1. Gain attention

Stimuli activates receptors

2. Inform learners of objectives

Creates level of expectation for learning

3. Stimulate recall of prior learning

Retrieval and activation of short-term memory

4. Present the content

Selective perception of content

5. Provide "learning guidance"

Semantic encoding for storage long-term memory

6. Elicit performance (practice)

Responds to questions to enhance encoding and verification

7. Provide feedback

Reinforcement and assessment of correct performance

8. Assess performance

Retrieval and reinforcement of content as final evaluation

9. Enhance retention and transfer

Retrieval and generalization of learned skill to new situation

?

Specific?methods?can be employed for implementing each of the nine events. For example:??

  • To gain students’ attention,?introduce?novelty, uncertainty, and surprise,?or pose thought-provoking questions.??
  • To provide learning guidance,?use examples and non-examples or provide case studies, visual images, analogies, and metaphors?(Northern Illinois University Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning, 2020).??

Because specific methods can be associated with each of Gagne’s events, the?Nine Events of Instruction provides a useful framework for designing a learning module.??

?
Components of Constructivist Learning Environments?

Constructivist learning environments are built on the theory that students construct knowledge rather than just passively take in information. As?they?experience the world and reflect upon those experiences,?students?build their own representations and incorporate new information into their pre-existing knowledge (schemas).?Students learn best when engaged in learning experiences rather passively receiving information.?

  • Learning is inherently a social process because it is embedded within a social context as students and teachers work together to build knowledge.?
  • Because knowledge cannot be directly imparted to students,?the goal of teaching is to provide experiences that facilitate the construction of knowledge?(University at Buffalo Center for Educational Innovation, 2021; emphasis added).?

Baviskar, Hartle, and Whitney (2009)?describe essential components?for designing?constructivist?learning environments:?

  • Elicit prior knowledge.?New knowledge is created in relation to learner’s pre-existing knowledge. Lessons, therefore, require eliciting relevant prior knowledge. Activities include: pre-tests, informal interviews,?and small group warm-up activities that require recall of prior knowledge.?
  • Create cognitive dissonance?by assigning?problems and activities that will challenge students. Knowledge is built as learners encounter novel problems and revise existing schemas as they work through the challenging problem.?
  • Apply knowledge with feedback.?Encourage students to evaluate new information and modify existing knowledge. Activities should allow for students to compare pre-existing schema to the novel situation. Activities might include presentations, small group or class discussions, and quizzes.?
  • Reflect on learning.?Provide students with an opportunity to?demonstrate what?they have learned. Activities might include: presentations, reflexive papers,?or creating a step-by-step tutorial for another student.?
    ?

Content Chunking

Content chunking is a method?by which?a?large amount of information?is organized?into manageable pieces?in order to help?students to retain and recall information more effectively and efficiently.??

Miller?(1956)?claimed that our?short-term memory could hold?only?seven, plus or minus two,?chunks of information. In practice,?depending on the complexity?of your material, you may want to consider minimizing the chunked material into?three to six?pieces for better comprehension.??

How do you apply this to your course??When mapping out the course structure (units, modules, lessons, etc.) and when designing teaching and learning materials:?

  • Prioritize:?Determine the main ideas and supporting content.?
  • Simplify:?Retain?relevant course content and remove extraneous?content.?Use visuals and other media in place of text when applicable?to lessen the load on working memory.??
  • Organize:?To?provide organizational cues and minimize cognitive load,?use:?
    • ?Bulleted and/or numbered lists?
    • ?Short subheadings?
    • ?Short sentences with one or two ideas per sentence?
    • ?Short paragraphs, no more than?three to four?sentences?
    • ?Easy-to-scan text, with bolding of key phrases??

The?SlideShare presentation,?Basics of Content Chunking?(Marican, 2014)?demonstrates?the process by which complex information can be better organized by chunking.??

See these?articles that discuss content chunking strategies along with techniques that can be applied to course development:?

Chunking Information for Instructional Design?
Applying content chunking for organizing modules, lessons, and topics.

4 Tips For Content Chunking In e-Learning

?

References?

Baviskar, S. N., Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist‐teaching method articles.?International Journal of Science Education,?31(4), 541-550.?
?
Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956).?The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain.?New York: David McKay Co., Inc.?

Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992).?Principles of?Instructional Design?(4th?ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.?

Gronlund, N. E. (1991).?How?to Write and Use Instructional Objectives?(4th ed.).?New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.?
https://unh.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01USNH_UNH/121i3ml/alma99…?

Krathwohl, D. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.?Theory into Practice,?41(4), 212–218.??
https://unh.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01USNH_UNH/1o8seis/cdi_proquest_journals_218799120?

Marican, F. (2014). Basics of Content Chunking (slideshare?presentation). Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/FareezaM/basics-of-chunking/16-Example_Conte…?

Miller, G. (1956). The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.?Psychological Review, 63(2),?81-97.?
https://unh.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01USNH_UNH/1o8seis/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81667847?

Northern Illinois University Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. (2020). Gagne’s nine events of instruction. In?Instructional guide for university faculty and teaching assistants.?Retrieved from?https://www.niu.edu/citl/resources/guides/instructional-guide/gagnes-nine-events-of-instruction.shtml?

University at Buffalo Center for Educational Innovation. (2021). Constructivism. Retrieved from?http://www.buffalo.edu/ubcei/enhance/learning/constructivism.html?

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005).?Understanding by Design?(Expanded 2nd ed.). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.?
https://unh.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01USNH_UNH/1g6a9m7/alma99…?

?